← Back to timeline

The 2009 Alliance Energy Deal Lifts Sweden's Ban on New Nuclear Reactors

On 5 February 2009 the four-party Alliance government agreed to lift the ban on building new nuclear reactors in Sweden. Two of the parties that signed it, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats, had spent decades pushing to phase nuclear power out.

Tier
A
Confidence
A
Bias risk
Low
Kind
reform
Date
2009-02-05
  • Correction Energy C Once Sweden's defining anti-nuclear party, the Centre Party under Maud Olofsson accepted the February 2009 Alliance energy deal to lift the ban on building new reactors.
    Why this verdict?

    Centre had been Sweden's defining anti-nuclear party since its grassroots origins. The 2009 energy deal was negotiated openly within the Alliance coalition and announced as a joint government decision before implementation. The shift was signalled through coalition negotiations, not a Centre congress vote — correction rather than confirmation.

  • Correction Energy KD Once a champion of phasing out nuclear power, the Christian Democrats joined the 2009 Alliance government deal to scrap the ban on building new reactors.
    Why this verdict?

    KD had supported nuclear phase-out as part of 1980 referendum commitments. The 2009 Alliance energy deal was negotiated within the coalition and announced publicly before implementation. KD accepted lifting the reactor ban through government coalition arithmetic, not a party congress — correction through coalition process.

For most of its modern history, the Centre Party was Sweden’s anti-nuclear party. Under Thorbjörn Fälldin it built its 1976 election campaign on opposition to nuclear power, and in 1978 the issue brought down his coalition government. The 1980 referendum set the country on a path to phasing nuclear power out, and the Centre Party held that line for decades. The Christian Democrats stood on the same side and argued for winding the reactors down.

On 5 February 2009 that changed. As part of the centre-right Alliance government, both parties signed an energy deal that lifted the ban on building new nuclear reactors. The deal cast nuclear power as part of Sweden’s future supply rather than something to be dismantled, and it opened the door to replacing the existing reactors with new ones on the same sites.

Government is what pushed them there. The Centre Party under Maud Olofsson and the Christian Democrats had entered the Alliance with the Moderates and the Liberals in 2006, and four parties that did not start in the same place now had to settle energy policy together. The deal was both the price of holding that coalition together and the thing it produced: a common line the two smaller parties could sign, even though it cut against their own long record. The Riksdag later treated the change as replacing one generation of reactors with the next, not as expanding the fleet.

If you are tracing how a party travels from one position to its opposite, this is a clean example: a line carried for decades, set aside inside a governing coalition. See how we read a value shift for the standard we apply.

Related entities

On the values timeline

Sources