1982 Super-Devaluation of the Krona
Within hours of taking office in October 1982, Olof Palme's second cabinet and Finance Minister Kjell-Olof Feldt devalued the Swedish krona by 16 per cent, bypassing the Riksbank. The move was the macroeconomic anchor of the SAP's tredje vägen — the Third Way — combining currency devaluation, restored export profitability, and continued welfare-state defence. It restored short-term competitiveness, lowered labour's income share, and contributed to the overheating that fed into the 1990s banking crisis.
Within hours of taking office in October 1982, Olof Palme‘s second cabinet and Finance Minister Kjell-Olof Feldt devalued the Swedish krona by 16 per cent — a much larger step than the 6-per-cent devaluation of 1976 or the 1981 bourgeois devaluation, and large enough to enter Swedish economic history under its own name: superdevalveringen. The cabinet bypassed the Riksbank’s planning process and forced the measure through; Riksbank chief Lars Wohlin was reportedly informed at very short notice.
The devaluation was the macroeconomic anchor of the SAP’s tredje vägen — the Third Way — the party’s response to stagflation that combined currency devaluation, restored export-sector profitability, and continued welfare-state defence. Lower labour’s share of national income to benefit capital and restore the industrial profit rate; defend welfare and union institutions on top of that recovered base; treat full employment as a binding constraint. It worked in the short term: Swedish exports surged, industrial profitability returned, and the late 1980s opened on a boom.
The longer-term consequences were less benign. The Third Way devaluation strategy lowered labour’s income share more than its architects had publicly defended, complicated the parallel introduction of wage-earner funds in 1983, and — combined with the 1989 currency-control deregulation and 1990 Nyckeln-affären — fed credit and asset-price overheating into the early-1990s banking crisis. The 1982 move remains the defining macroeconomic reference point of post-1980 Swedish economic historiography, and left and right historians frame it very differently.